
Stay-at-home-mothers (SAHM's) play an important and irreplaceable role in a child's life. Children who are primarily raised by a parent are generally happier, more secure and more independent than children who are in daycare full-time. They are less likely to have behavior and learning problems, since Mom is at home to teach her children what she wants them to learn. Children benefit more from having a mother at home than from being in a day-care center or being a “latch-key” kid.
Parenting is never easy. Any parent can testify to this. For a mother, the decision to stay home with her children can be a difficult one. Society continuously tells us that in order to have value, a woman needs a career, needs to be bringing in an income, needs to have some fulfillment outside of her husband, her children and her home. Yet many women choose to stay home and raise their children, believing that this is the most important job they can have. A study done in 2005 shows that working women spent an average of 3 hours, 29 minutes per day with their families. Of that time, only 2.5 hours were spent caring for children, while 8.5 hours were spent on paid work (Kaye, 2009). How can we expect to teach our children good values when they spend less time with their parents than they do watching television? Interestingly, the value of an at-home mom's work was estimated at $116,805. It's time we stopped thinking of at-home moms as not contributing to the family.
I was blessed in my childhood to have a mother who stayed home to raise my brothers and me. Childhood and adolescence were not easy for me; I doubt they are for anyone. I found plenty of reasons to be angry with my mother, or to blame her for whatever problems I had. I could do that because I knew that no matter how badly I behaved, she would still love me. I knew she would always love me, and would always be there for me, because she was there, every day, to prove it. She did take a job once, working in a day-care center, to help out with the bills. She and my father quickly realized that the little bit she was making was not enough to help our finances. They further discovered that not having Mom's time and attention caused us to have more behavior problems. We were more aggressive and less cooperative and obedient, even though we were only spending the afternoons with someone else.
No one can love a child like a mother. No matter how carefully parents choose a day-care provider or a nanny, there is a connection between a mother and child that can't be purchased. Children bond with the person who is there with them, kissing their boo-boos, cuddling and playing and listening to their problems. Several years ago, my roommate and best friend was the single mother of a one-year-old. Out of necessity, she had to put Tyler in daycare, so she could work. For several weeks, he would cry whenever she took him home from daycare, because he didn't want to leave. He called her Susan, which was the name of the daycare provider, and called me Sarah, the name of one of his daycare friends. Susan was a wonderful, caring woman who did an excellent job of taking care of Tyler, but he bonded with her instead of his mother, because he spent so much of his waking time away from his own mother. My friend felt horribly guilty at leaving him behind, and heart-broken when he didn't want to be with her.
Parents have a responsibility to teach their children. Children are still growing, and learning new things everyday. They learn values and skills from the people around them. If they spend most of their time with a stranger, they will learn the values of that care-giver. Teaching moments arise throughout the day, without warning and without planning. Sometimes they arrive as casual comments or simple questions. As a nanny, I went for a walk one day with Amber, an eleven-year girl. As we walked up a steep hill near her house, she made a casual comment that she wished someone would come along and give us a ride up the hill. Because I was there to hear that comment, we had a conversation about why you never get into a car with a stranger, and why just knowing that someone lives up the street isn't a good reason to get into his car. I was uncomfortable with the topic, since I wasn't her mother, and I didn't feel it was my place to introduce topics like rape to a child. But I also knew that she needed to know the potential consequences of her actions. Fortunately, when her mother arrived home and I told her we'd had that conversation, she fully supported my decision. There were several other occasions where similar teaching moments arose, about such topics as what to do when a friend shoplifts, or when touching is inappropriate. Many of Amber's friends stayed home alone after school, or with an older sibling who had his/her own concerns. If Amber had been among that number, no one would have been there to discuss these situations and give her answers. By the time her mother arrived home from work, that thought of hers would have been gone and forgotten. Those conversations would never have occurred.
Children need individual attention. Left home alone, or in a daycare center with a dozen other kids, it's difficult for them to receive that focused attention. The troublemakers, the screamers and the most needy get most of the attention from the available adults. Unless children know how to speak up and ask for what they need, it is far too easy to overlook them. But when a child is home with mother, she can make her child the main focus of her attention. She can spend time with him or her playing, talking and teaching. The child will benefit from knowing that he or she is the most important person in Mom's life. Even if there are other children, they will usually not be the same age. So when the baby is down for her nap, an older child may now have some alone time with Mom. This attention from her will increase and reinforce the child's sense of self-worth as well as self-confidence and security.
One of the main arguments for putting a child in daycare is that children need daycare for proper socialization and to learn independence. Tina, a former preschool teacher, suggests that this is not the case. In her experience, the children who came only for a few hours for preschool were more secure and independent than those who were staying all day for daycare. Tina said that the preschool-only children were happy to be there, because they knew that Mom would be back for them soon. It was more like a playdate for them. The children who were there all day were whiny and clingy. In some cases, they even purposely behaved badly enough that the daycare had to call their mothers to come for them. This example suggests that full-time daycare actually teaches young children to be insecure and dependent, and that they need the security of knowing that mom or dad is there most of the time.
A study was done recently to evaluate the effects of parental employment on children's cognitive ability. The results indicate that having the mother work, while the children are in daycare causes results to the children that are “negative and sizeable. Having a mother that works full-time and uses childcare during one year is associated with a reduction in ability test scores of approximately 1.8%” (Bernal, 2008).
Hiring a nanny may be better for the children than a daycare center, but only if the parents are fortunate enough to find a nanny who is caring, knowledgeable about children, and committed to their well-being. Most nannies are young women, many of whom know next to nothing about children. Switching caregivers frequently can damage a child's self-esteem and sense of self-worth, but young adults are not known for their staying power. In many cases, six months in one job is a lot for them. It can be hard on children when they bond with someone, only to lose them a few months later, and have to adjust to a new caregiver. And when children are being watched by someone who is preoccupied with school work, boyfriends, and the next party, they may not be receiving the full benefit of having that one-on-one time with an adult. Another drawback of choosing a nanny over a daycare center is that the nanny is unsupervised. When hiring a nanny, it is extremely important to choose the right one. Even when the nanny is fully committed to her job, it is still a job to her. In her book, Dr. Laura mentioned a letter from a former preschool teacher in a daycare center. This woman said she thought she loved all the kids as though they were her own, until she became a mother herself. Then she realized that as much as she liked the kids she had cared for, she loved her own child so much more, and that no one could ever love her child the way she did (Schlessinger, 2009, p. 107).
Being a full-time homemaker means that a mother has more time to take care of the house, and take care of the children than if she were trying to juggle that with a full-time job. That can equate to less stress, and less hurry. As a result of having a calmer life, the children feel happier and more secure, and the husband is more likely to enjoy coming home after work. There may be less money, but there is more time for fun family activities, like game night or driving to the beach on the weekend. Children will benefit from having stronger relationships with both parents, since there is more time for fun.
Making the decision to give up a career and stay home can be difficult and require sacrifice. Many mothers don't feel they can afford not to work. Obviously, there are families for whom this is true. Sometimes there is no father to provide for the family, or because of circumstances, he is unable to for all their needs. Before making the claim that “I can't afford not to work,” it is important to carefully examine the financial costs and benefits of the second income. Amy Dacyczyn (pronounced decision), author of The Tightwad Gazette, set out to prove that she and her husband could raise a large family without two full-time incomes. One of her newsletters contained an article on how to calculate the value of the second income. She points out that the traditional two-income lifestyle can be inefficient. Once the costs for daycare, transportation, increased taxes, work wardrobes and fast food or quick-to-prepare meals are calculated, that second income may not pay more than a few dollars per hour. Many of the products and services that we pay for can be eliminated or cut down when someone is home to garden, sew, cook meals instead of buying convenience foods, clean the house, tutor the children, etc. (Dacyczyn, 1992, p. 24). As further proof of her theory, the Dacyczyns managed to raise six children and become financially independent, without having a second income. This feat required commitment, sacrifice and creativity, but more than paid them back in family fun and closeness.
Monica Resinger, in a recent article, backed up Amy Dacyczyn's theory. She was a working mother who had to choose between meeting the needs of her boss and her young son. She followed her instincts and chose her son, which led to her decision to quit working and stay home with him. She found that her spending habits were the main reason they couldn't live on her husband's salary. She began to look at what she was really spending her money on, and found ways to cut back on unnecessary items. She says, “I found that nothing was more important to me than being home raising my son” (2000).
Many mothers work because they think they need to. In reality, some of these mothers are working to maintain a certain kind of lifestyle. New cars, name brand clothing, gadgets and toys of all kinds, credit card payments, boats, are where the money actually goes. Does an eleven-year old really need to have a laptop computer, a cell phone, an IPOD, and a digital camera of her own? Does a nine year old boy need to have an X-Box, a PlayStation 2, a Wii, five different hand-held video games systems and more games than he'll ever play? Do they benefit more from having cable television in every room than they do from being able to spend time with their mother? When all is said and done, these things are just that. . . things. Things are nice to have, but no amount of “things” can replace a mother's time, attention and affection.
Another reason women give for needing to work outside the home is that they don't have the patience and tolerance to stay home with their children. Some of them say that their kids would drive them crazy. How would make a child feel, to hear that her mother can't stand to be around her? No one would ever say that to or in front of an adult. Children need to know that they are loved, that they are more important than anybody or anything else. One friend said that she doesn't have the patience her mother did. She prefers to work, but she feels guilty leaving her children, and she thinks she was luckier (with a stay-at-home mom) than her kids are. “Patience is not a virtue that people are born with; it's an ability one develops with practice” (Schlessinger, 2009, p. 139). I have never considered myself a patient person. My mother is a patient woman. After all, she put up with everything my brothers and I could think of, and continued to love us anyway. Even in two years of working as a nanny, and volunteering as a nursery worker at my church, I developed a lot more patience with children than I would have believed possible. Just having the children in the car helped me to keep my temper when dealing with heavy traffic, because I knew they were watching and learning from my example.
Sometimes that second income is necessary. In these cases, a little creativity can help. One friend has a wife and three children. She stayed home with the first two, but decided to go back to work when the third was still young. Thanks to having family nearby and flexible scheduling, they were able to make certain that he always had a family member to care for him.
Another friend raised three children while staying home with each of them. She and her husband run a business, and Kim can do much of the office work from her home office. Once her children were in school, she began cleaning houses, because she can do it during the day when her children are in school. When there was no school, or she had a sick child, she could cancel or reschedule her jobs, because she worked for herself. Her income supplements her husband's, but she has found that putting her main focus on her children is worth the financial sacrifice. Her daughter's best friend comes from a family with similar values, where both parents work outside the home. Because Kim is home, she spends time with both her children, and their friends. Her daughter, Kelly, now in high school, is more connected, more secure, and indulges in less problematic experimentation than her friend Payton. Kim has been there to teach her values to her daughter, to pick her up when she needs a ride home, to advise her in the little problems that crop up in every day life. Payton has loving parents, but they aren't there when she needs help or attention. As a result, she turns to her boyfriend for the affection she's missing, which brings up a whole different set of problems for a sixteen year old girl.
Women feel the need to contribute, to their families and to the world. There have been and continue to be many wonderful women who contribute as teachers, doctors, emergency responders, librarians, etc. Mothers who stay at home to care for their children are frequently made to feel that they are not doing anything worthwhile. Our society values money and a career more than “just” being a mother. What we too often fail to realize is that “the woman is the center of the universe, the very breath of a family” (Schlessinger, 2009, p. 137.)

One friend expressed an opinion that education is wasted on the woman who stays home to raise children. I disagree. Mothers help their children with homework, and teach them about the world in which they live. The more education a woman has, the more she can teach her children. The woman who plays the piano or paints has no need to send her children to someone else to learn these skills. The woman who has taken biology in college is better prepared to explain to her young son the many questions he may ask while playing in the yard or taking a nature walk. Women with more education have a higher self-esteem, and are less likely to stay in an abusive relationship. Children of women with a strong, healthy sense of self-worth will also have a healthy sense of self-worth. Children benefit from having intelligent, well-educated mothers, because most of what a child learns in his or her early years comes from the primary caregiver.
Yes, parenting is hard work. Yes, giving up a career to stay home requires sacrifice, commitment, patience, and a willingness to put children first. But the best argument from staying home with children is the incredible feeling that comes when a small child puts his arms around your neck and says “I love you,” without being prompted. No facts, statistics or studies can measure the pleasure a mother derives from being there with her children, watching and participating in their “firsts”. The first smile, first word, first step, first day of school, first boyfriend, first job only come once. Being a mother is not an imposition, or a degradation. To mothers all over the world, it is a special, unique experience that is worth more than college degrees or promotions. As one mother wrote, “living the simple life to be home raising your babies is priceless. . . for everything else, there is a credit card debit!” (Schlessinger, 2009, p. 171).
References
Bernal, Raquel, (2008, November). The effect of maternal employment and child care on children's cognitive development. International Economic Review, 49(4) 1173. Abstract retrieved August 25, 2009 from ProQuest.
Dacyczyn, A. (1992). The tightwad gazette: Promoting thrift as a viable alternative lifestyle. New York: Villard Books.
Kaye, M., (2009, May). Women's Work. Today's Parent, 26(5), 83-84, 86, 88. Retrieved August 14, 2009, from Research Library. (Document ID: 1699561891).
Resinger, Monica (2000). A decision to stay at home. Mommytips.com. Retrieved September 7, 2009 from http://mommytips.com/article/Parenting/SAHM/ decisiontostayhome.htm.
Schlessinger, L. (2009). In praise of stay-at-home moms. New York: HarperCollins.